Does Manchester United regret it? Give up the introduction of Martin, defeated Manchester City 0-3, and the 23-year-old new goalkeeper missed the appearance

On September 15, the Premier League Manchester City derby ended with Manchester City's victory. In this game, Manchester City scored the third goal in the 68th minute, ending the suspense of the game ahead of schedule, Mingjin retreated, and preparing for the Champions League. Manchester United only won 1 in 5 games in the new season, and the team's heavy money signing results were not good. Do Manchester United regret it? Give up the introduction of Martin, defeated Manchester City 0-3, and the 23-year-old new goalkeeper missed the appearance.

In this Manchester City derby, Haaland scored twice, Foden scored 1 goal, and Duku gave 2 assists. In contrast, Manchester United has spent 76.5 million euros to sign Sheshko so far, and Cunha, who has 74.2 million yuan, missed the game due to injury and did not score a goal for Manchester United. The goalkeeper Ramons, who spent 21 million euros to sign, failed to play and watched the team suffer a three-goal defeat on the bench. Manchester United has problems in the offensive and defensive ends in the new season. The forward cannot score the goal and the goalkeeper cannot defend it.

Manchester United did not sign Martin this summer, which was an obvious wrong decision. Why did Manchester City let new aid Donnarumma start in the Manchester City derby, while Manchester United didn't let Lamens play? The answer is obvious. Donnarumma has proved his goalkeeper. Lamons has not yet played in the five major leagues. It is Manchester United's "lottery-style signing". Amorin dares not let him take the lead.

Donnarumma completed one divine pounce in this game, resolving Mbermo's shot, preventing Manchester United from chasing the score to 1-2, and finally leading the team to close Manchester United. Manchester United's new goalkeeper Lamons watched the game off the court and accumulated experience. If Manchester United has Martin, they will definitely start in the game against Manchester City. After all, he is the World Cup goalkeeper, leading the Argentina Championship three consecutive championships, won the Yasin Award 2, helped Villa reach the Champions League round of 8, and was still an expert in the preservation point. He has absolutely no problem with his ability. Manchester United's defense problem will be much better after getting Martin, and the results of the game with Manchester City are likely to become different.

But Manchester United did not sign Martin, but chose Lamons, mainly because Lamons was young and 10 years younger than Martin, 33. But Manchester United should know that Anthony, who has a transfer fee of 95 million yuan, is also very young, and Sancho, who has a transfer fee of 85 million yuan, is also a young player. What's the result? Did they play out at Manchester United?

Manchester United's failure to sign Martin is also related to Villa's high asking price, which is reported to be 40 million pounds. But if Manchester United negotiates with Villa when the summer window opens, and Martin is strongly willing to leave the team and dreams of joining Manchester United, the transfer fee can definitely be reduced. But Manchester United didn't sign a new goalkeeper until the last day of the summer window. What were they doing? There is no need for so much negotiation time in the summer window. Some excellent players are still strong at the age of 35-40, and Martin still has many years of peak period. Manchester United gave up him because of a small loss of big.