Barcelona s second controversial goal, Ferran did nothing wrong, and the referee did nothing wrong

The new season of La Liga has begun. The defending champion Barcelona faced Mallorca in his first game, scoring 3 goals and winning a victory, but this is the case with football matches. There are certain controversies in every game, otherwise football will lose a lot of highlights. So where is the controversy between Barcelona and Mallorca? That was Barcelona's second goal.

Mallorca lost to Barcelona 0-3 in the first round of La Liga. Ferran's second goal in the game caused great controversy. After the game, the captain of Mallorca, Lello, also the person who fell to the ground, accepted an interview with the media: "There is nothing to explain, everyone has seen it. In the past week, I have not been talking about any agreement. If someone falls to the ground, the game should be paused. I fell to the ground for 10 seconds and was a little dizzy and couldn't get up at all. Let others explain, I'm not saying that I blame the referee, but if the rules are written like this, then I have to do so."

This is Mallorca's captain. What the parties said still questioned the way the referee fell to the ground. Some people think the referee's verdict was reasonable, while others support Mallorca's captain Lello. In fact, from the perspective of football, Ferran did nothing wrong and the referee did nothing wrong. But Mallorca's injured world was achieved.

First of all, when Lelo fell to the ground, the referee was right in front of him. When the referee did not stop the game, Barcelona players can attack. If it goes up to the moral perspective, Barcelona players' offense is duty, and not attacking is moral, then there is no need. Because this is in the game, Ferran did nothing wrong. The wrong thing should be that when the referee did not stop the game, the Mallorca player had already made the stop action. Even when Ferran shot, the opponent's goalkeeper did not have time to make defensive actions.

You should know that the referee is the master of the field, and the whistle keeps playing. Many times, due to moral issues, some people score goals, which is commonplace, so the same is true for offside goals now. As long as the referee does not stop the game, even if it is offside, they must complete the action first. What if it is not? Isn't it too late to regret?

In addition, it is the referee's judgment standard. The referee cannot stop the game immediately because the player suddenly falls on the court, because this will cause many people to get loopholes in the rules. The implication is not that Leroy, but that of those players who pretend to fall once they cannot control the ball. The appearance of such a player is the point that the referee must be careful, so the referee will be extra careful in the penalty area.

Furthermore, this time, Lello took the initiative to defend with a header. Even if there is any problem, there will be no big problems. After all, the referee is close at hand, so the referee will definitely let the player complete the attack, and then the video assistant referee will determine whether the ball is valid. If the opponent's attack is deliberately blocked because of a problem with the defense, the referee can also see it. So the referee did nothing wrong with this controversy in this game.