Four rounds and four finals, is it really only luck? It turns out that this is the key

The ultimate kill! The Pacers are defeated again, and Halliburton reappears in the sight of fans around the world. Is it reasonable? The Thunder are obviously a better team and have better strength. Why are they killed by the Pacers? If one kill may be lucky, what about four? This can no longer be described by luck. Why can walkers always create miracles? It turns out that this is the key.

Four finals in four rounds, fans all over the world think that Halliburton is powerful. Of course, we cannot deny his big heart attribute at critical moments. I wonder if you have noticed that there is a problem behind almost every final kill, that is, the Pacers always fall behind by a big score difference, and then catch up with the score at the limit to complete the final kill. This is a question worthy of deep thought for fans.

Take G1 in the finals as an example. The data in this game are abnormal. It is obvious that the Pacers are the side with more mistakes, and the Thunder are the side with more attacks, but the ending is a different scene. It is actually easy to understand, because the Pacers seized every opportunity to attack and their hit rate is far better than the Thunder.

Everyone knows that the Thunder is a team known for its defense. This game also demonstrates the team's defensive ability, but the game is 48 minutes. Can the Thunder maintain a high-intensity defense of 48 minutes? Of course the answer is no. Although he was 15 points ahead in the last quarter, it can be said that the Thunder underestimated the enemy and reduced the defensive intensity. However, I would like to ask back, is it because the Pacers' offense that is too strong, and the Thunder's physical fitness has declined and cannot keep up with the Pacers' offensive intensity?

They are definitely not as simple as luck. The depth of the lineup rotation is the confidence of the Pacers along the way. We must admit that the Pacers' hard strength may not be the strongest, but the frequent reversals in the final quarter. The only explanation is that in addition to Halliburton's big heart attribute, the most important thing is their physical advantage, and the core of all this is their coach: Carlisle.

The Pacers can reach this point today, Carlisle is the key to winning. Even in the finals stage, Carlisle still uses a 10-man rotation lineup. It can be said that Carlisle's operation has broken fans' perception of playoff games. In traditional perception, the playoffs are the moment of competing for stars, and the Pacers are just the opposite. There is no absolute core in the team. Whoever plays better will play. It is in such a competitive mechanism that allows them to have someone to explode in every game.

In fact, it is summarized in four words: physical fitness and scatteredness. No matter what team they play against, the Pacers are the ones with physical strength. They have already exceeded their missions until now, so compared with the Pacers, the Thunder will be under greater pressure. On the contrary, it is in this casual environment that the Pacers play more confidently.

Rather than saying that the Thunder lost the game, it is better to say that they lost to Carlisle. At critical moments, it is not called a free-range method that allows players to handle it themselves, and even professionals call them laymen. However, they can always create miracles again and again in such an impossible environment. Of course, objectively speaking, the Pacers cannot count on their hopes every time to defeat their opponents. Why do they fall behind by a large score every time? This also reflects a problem from the side, that is, the gap between the team's strength.

But the reason why fans really like the Pacers is actually the process of creating miracles. When the whole world thinks that the Thunder will win, the author prefers the Pacers' team basketball, hoping that they can continue to create more miracles under the leadership of Coach Carlisle.