Goodbye Kuzma! Antetokounmpo will welcome Mr. 30 million to assist? This is a real struggle in the Bucks

According to the NBA China official website: According to famous reporter Ary, Antetokounmpo is not expected to apply for a transaction.

Of course, this is more of a reporter's guess. But one thing is certain, the Bucks management must have wanted to leave Antetokounmpo, and they are very determined. Otherwise, Lillard would not be bought out and then occupy the team's 20 million salary space every year for the next five years.

What about the next step for the Bucks’ reinforcement plan?

I think it is the right time to trade Kuzma.

Explanation point 1: Efficiency. Since joining the team, Kuzma has achieved many basic and high-level data hit new lows. For example, the personal efficiency value of 10.5 is the lowest in life. For example, the free throw percentage of 66.3% is much lower than the career average of 72.1%.

Explanation point 2: Contract. Even this summer, Kuzma still has two years and 42 million contracts.

To sum up two points, the efficiency is very low and the large contract, it can be said that Kuzma has a low cost performance. More precisely, it didn't help the team much - the team lost 1.5 points in a 100-round net when they were on the court, and the team won 11 points in a 100-round net when they were not on the court. In short, Kuzma's presence in the Bucks are losing and a team absent are winning. What is the ideal result for trading Kuzma?

Judging from buying out Lillard and giving Miles Turner a 100 million contract, the Bucks' goal in the new season is definitely to win the championship. In this way, the ideal result will definitely be to change to a stronger combat power, if there is a potential departure from the team, DeRozan.

is almost a tie, such as Anthony Simmons, who was traded to the Celtics last month. The worst result is downward trading. For example, Grant, who has become a junk contract, is simply trading for the sake of trading.

Speaking of this, something interesting is coming.

The US media "Fadeaway World" recommends that the Bucks and the Trail Blazers make a 3-for-1 deal. Specifically, the Bucks sent Kuzma, Jackson and Grant in the first round in 27 years.

Description point: Contract. Grant has three years and a contract of 112 million yuan, with an average salary of 34 million yuan, a typical Mr. 30 million yuan.

If the Bucks trade as suggested, then I think they are really fighting.

Reason 1: Efficiency comparison. The real shooting rate is 54.5%, Grant 52.3%; positive and negative values, Kuzma-1.5, Grant 1.8; victory contribution value is 0.9, Grant 0.3. In other words, Grant is not as good as Kuzma in terms of personal ending, offense and defense, and helping the team.

Reason 2: The cost is high. Jackson is a full role player, meaning it is optional. But the first round in 27 years is a real first round, even if it is an exchange with the Pelicans. The key point is that Grant is not as good as Kuzma.

To sum up the two points, we can understand that "fight" is the Bucks' downward trade against Kuzma - the gain is not worth the loss. The only thing that can be understood is to demonstrate the determination to leave Antetokounmpo. In fact, as Kuzma said just now, he would not help the team even if he didn't change Grant. Potentially, there is a high probability of leaving the team this summer.