Total 65 million! The Lakers should chase potential forwards, US media will give 4 and 2 plans, and will make the first round of Hachimura, etc.

We all know that after reaching a buyout with the Trail Blazers, Ayton chose to join the Lakers for 16 million in two years. For Ayton, what needs to be explained is:

description point: age. Aiton, born in July 1998, just turned 27 years old. Normally, he can maintain a peak of physical function for at least 5 years. From another perspective, at least Pelinka doesn't have to worry about the inside in the short term.

Putting aside Ayton, Pelinka and Doncic completed a three-year, 165 million early contract renewal. Judging from the decisive contract renewal, as long as the Lakers do not actively choose the trade, then Doncic may leave the team almost zero.

Doncic + Ayton, one inside and one outside, the focus is on the Lakers framework. Therefore, in my opinion, Pelinka needs to find a front line. To be precise, a young forward who can grow up with Doncic. Speaking of this, we have to mention Laravia.

Description point: upper limit. Although it was the No. 19 show in 222, the upper limit is not high at present. Otherwise, the rookie would not have been refused to execute the fourth-year team option by the Grizzlies in their third grade and traded to the Kings.

Putting aside the young Laravia, the remaining Lakers' forward line, Kazuyamura Hiroshi and Vanderbilt's lack of defense and offense, means that neither of them will be part of the players' long-term plan.

Speaking of this, something interesting is coming.

The US media "Fadeaway World" suggests that the Lakers go to chase the Heat's Jaime Hax and Andrew Wiggins. And 4 for 2 plans were sent: Lakers left Hachimura, Knector, Kleber, and Hax and Wiggins in the first round in 2011.

is the most important reason why Wiggins is to promote the probability of reaching a deal. For Hax, I think it's the potential front line.

Reason 1: Location. In the 3481 minutes of his career, he played in the third position, and obviously he mainly played in the small forward position.

Reason 2: Age. Hax, born in February 2001, is only 24 years old, and normally he has not reached the peak of his player. In other words, there is also plasticity.

Reason 3: Progressiveness. The true positive and negative values of offense and defense in the rookie season were -2.2 and 0.3 respectively. By the second grade, the two numbers increased to -1.4 and 0.4 respectively. The irreplaceable value brought by the progress of both offense and defense has increased from 0.1 to 0.4.

focuses on the front line and is only 24 years old. Coupled with the progressive attributes, it is obvious that Hax can be defined as the potential front line.

However, even in the long-term 31-year first round, the cost is a bit too high in my opinion.

Reason 1: Contract. Hux and Wiggins have a total of 65 million contracts, of which Wiggins alone account for 58 million for two years.

Reason 2: Upper limit. Although Hax has certain potential, it is still difficult to reach the star. I think the ideal height is a quasi-All-star forward like Bridges. The problem is that the Lakers' first round in 31 years is that they can get star players.

For this reason, I think it would be reasonable to switch the first round to a protected first round, so that the Lakers would pay less and get a good player at the same time.