Media person: Some people pretend to be confused and deliberately describe the Nets coach as a villain.

October 13th, in the second game of the NBA China Game, the Nets reversed the situation 111-109 to avenge the Suns. In this campaign, Chinese player and Nets forward Zeng Fanbo failed to get a chance to play.

Sports Weekly basketball reporter Kong Dexin said in his radio program "Basketball News":

I can fully understand everyone's desire for Zeng Fanbo to play more, and I also understand that some people think that since it is the China game, Zeng Fanbo should play both games and should get more opportunities to perform. I think this is normal, and I can understand that some media people or self-media people have such a mentality, and this is OK.

But what I cannot accept, or what I do not recognize, is that some people "pretend to be confused". They may know how cruel the NBA's competitive environment is and what the real situation is, but they deliberately hype up the traffic, deliberately describe the Nets coach as a "evil person", or portray the Nets team as a negative image. I think this is really not very interesting - is it really so short of traffic?

Moreover, doesn’t that particularly serious and intense way of expression show disrespect for Zeng Fanbo himself? This seems to have completely defined him as a "performance mascot" for the China Games, and believes that he deserves certain privileges on such occasions. And isn't this kind of "privilege" thinking just because you think in your heart that he is not strong enough and needs special care to reach a state that satisfies you? If Zeng Fanbo is a player who really wants to strive for NBA opportunities through his own efforts, he certainly doesn't want others to say that every minute of his playing time is obtained by "privilege." Anyway, that's what I personally think.